The amendment to the 2014 Child and Family Act is clearly intended to encourage the continued participation of parents in a child`s life, but it is important to distinguish this from the presumption of shared care. Shared care is the term used where there is a provision where that children live with both parents, even though these parents live separately. The label “shared assistance” is essentially of semantic importance, because a parent with parental responsibility for a child, but without the usefulness of a “life with” order would not lose their right to play an important role in a child`s life. However, etiquette can make a big difference in how parents see their role in a child`s life and help reinforce the fact that both parents play an equally important role in a child`s education. In recent years, the courts have taken a steady step towards organizing shared care in most cases where both parents are ready and able to care for the child, and there are no significant welfare or abuse issues that would make the child unsuitable. However, this study on judicial proceedings, which was completed in 2011, is part of the number of applications to the Court of Justice concerning children that continue to decline following the significant withdrawal of the legal aid system in 2013. The report is concerned that cuts in legal aid are jeopardizing access to the Court`s system. The overall picture is complex in light of recent changes to the legislation and there may be other reasons for the decline in the Court`s figures.B of Justice, such as disputes settled through family mediation. Unless the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility has been rebutted, the court must then consider whether a joint custody order for the child, which must spend the same time with that of the child`s parent, is in the best interests of the child. Family Justice Reformed (second edition: June 2017) contains detailed comments on the single family court and the Children and Families Act 2014, Pts 1 and 2 (which deal with family equity), including clear and comprehensive guidelines on the underlying procedural regime and the reasons for the reforms. Gabbie has more than 20 years of experience in family law.
She has expertise on complex issues, including post-divorce financial aspects; Pre-marriage and post-marriage; Cases with an international component; and civil partnerships. Gabbie is regularly taught by domestic and foreign clients. you… “I know my rights” – With this statement, of course, a family lawyer will address Section 2A of the Children`s Act 1989 and the presumption of parental involvement. For non-parent caregivers, a “life with” order also gives children parental responsibility and thus allows you to make decisions for them, passport applications, etc. As the natural parent of the child (who appears on the birth certificate for all births after 1.12.2003), you would automatically have these rights, so that a “life with” order would make no difference. Hawkins family law `Boutique Family Law law firm that beats above its weight`, as per… Assuming that the child wishes to see both parents, that they are probably not harmed and that both parents are able to meet their needs in the same way, there should in principle be no reason why a joint care order should not be appropriate.